My research lies at the intersection of strategy, human capital, and human resources, and investigates the role of individuals in firm performance and strategy. My research approach largely relies on the econometric analysis of archival field data. While I heavily draw on economic methods and strategy/management theories, I also incorporate literature and insights from economics, sociology, organizational behavior, and social psychology. My work to date has largely focused on four settings: 1) Industrial laundry cleaning, 2) Real estate brokers/agents, 3) Emergency Medical Service providers (i.e. ambulances), and 4) US Government Employees.

My interests and expertise broadly fall in the following areas: Strategic Human Capital, Incentives and Compensation, Agency Theory, Labor Markets and Employee Mobility, Social and Relational Capital, and Organizational Strategy.


11. Cooper, R. and T. Gubler. (2020). "Specialized Human Capital in Professional Services: Task Specificity and Firm Performance", in Proceedings of the Eightieth Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Guclu Antinc, Ed. Online ISSN: 2151-6561.

10. Gubler, T. and R. Cooper (2019). "Socially Advantaged? How Social Affiliations Influence Access to Valuable Service Professional Transactions." Strategic Management Journal, 40(13): 2287-2314. Find it on SSRN HERE.  

9. Gubler, T. (2019). “Connected, but Qualified? Social Affiliations, Human Capital, and Service Professional Performance." Organization Science, 30(5), 912-936. Find it on SSRN HERE.

         **Winner of Sumantra Ghoshal Best Paper Award, BPS Division, Academy of Management 2017

         **Previous Title: "When Social Capital Hurts: The Role of Human Capital Experience and Fit"


8. Gubler, T., Larkin, I., and L. Pierce (2018). “Doing Well by Making Well: The Impact of Corporate Wellness Programs on Employee Productivity.” Management Science, 64(11): 4967-4987. Find it on SSRN HERE.

         **Named top 100 business school paper by societal impact by the Financial Times

7.  Gubler, T. (2017). "Connected, but Qualified? Social Affiliations, Human Capital, and Service Professional Performance", in Proceedings of the Seventy-seventh Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Guclu Atinc, Ed. Online ISSN: 2151-6561. 

6. Gubler, T., Larkin, I., and L. Pierce (2016). “Motivational Spillovers from Awards: Crowding Out in a Multitasking Environment”, Organization Science, 27(2), 286-303. Find it on SSRN HEREPreviously titled “The Dirty Laundry of Employee Award Programs: Evidence from the Field”

5. Gubler, T. (2015). "Social Affiliations and Performance of Experts in Organizations", in Proceedings of the Seventy-fifth Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, John Humphreys, Ed., 1:15058.

4. Gubler, T. and L. Pierce (2014). “Healthy, Wealthy, and Wise: Retirement Planning Predicts Employee Health Improvements,” Psychological Science, 25(9), 1822-1830. Find it on ResearchGate HERE.

3. Zenger, T. and T. Gubler. (2013). "Agency Problems," in Palgrave Encyclopedia of Strategic Management, David Teece and Mie Augier, Eds., Palgrave Macmillan. 

2. Nickerson, J., T. Gubler, and K. Dirks. (2013). “Trust and the Economic Theory of the Firm," in Handbook of Advances in Trust Research, Aks Zaheer and Reinhard Bachman, Ed., Edward Elgar (Cheltenham). Find it on ResearchGate HERE.

1. Butler, R., W. Johnson, and T. Gubler. (2009). "Economic Burden," in Work and Cancer Survivors, Michael Feuerstein, Ed., New York: Springer


12. Anchoring on Historical Round Number Reference Points: Expert Experience Corrects for Pricing Bias While Market Forces Do Not" (with Scott Wiltermuth and Lamar Pierce). Under First Round Review. Available on SSRN HERE.

Buyers typically strive to negotiate low prices for durable goods. Psychologically-salient round number reference points (e.g., $10,000) influence these purchasing decisions. However, existing research does not capture how these historical reference points influence the anchoring effect of previous sales prices on future valuations. We argue that the anchoring effect of prior sales prices on subsequent prices is discontinuous at round numbers, such that it matters disproportionately whether a previous sales price reached a round-number threshold. Buyers paying a price just below a round number may sacrifice money because they receive disproportionately less when reselling the good. We further argue that while market forces are unlikely to attenuate this effect, highly-experienced professional intermediaries may. Using data on over 13,000 repeat real estate transactions, we find that home buyers who previously paid just under a $10,000 reference point subsequently list and sell their homes for about 1.3 percent (over $2000) less on average than do buyers selling comparable homes who previously paid at or above a round number threshold. This drop is observable controlling for home characteristics and the general relationship between previous and current prices. Buyers who cross a $10,000 threshold by paying $1000 more therefore would earn a return of 215%. An experiment with 1010 participants replicates these findings and increases confidence in causality. Market mechanisms, the negotiation process, and organizational support provided to intermediaries does not correct substantively for these discontinuities: Lower initial listing prices persist to final sales prices. However, using a highly-experienced agent attenuates intergenerational pricing bias.

13. "Employee Dilemmas From Competing Organizational Objectives: Insights from Emergency Medical Services" (with Haibo Liu and Alexandru Roman). Revising for submission. Available on SSRN HERE.

The literature on multiple-goal organizations highlights the unique challenge of simultaneously meeting potentially conflicting financial and prosocial objectives. In this paper, we study how frontline employees deal with these competing demands within the context of Emergency Medical Service (EMS) crews responding to 9-1-1 calls. Using data from 31 states reported to the US National Emergency Medical Services Information System, we find that even in the absence of direct and immediate individual financial incentives, EMS crews are responsive to the financial objective of their agencies by providing higher levels of service to patients with higher ability to pay. We find that both private insurance and Medicare patients receive more procedures (4.6% and 1.5%) and have longer transport times (5.1% and 3.9%) than Medicaid patients controlling for time, call, patient, and condition characteristics. However, we also find evidence suggesting that EMS crews dynamically vacillate between organizational objectives between calls, depending on the context and the salience of the objective. We find these ability to pay differences increase on busy days when the financial opportunity costs are high, and when their employing agency has stronger financial need. However, disparities decrease significantly when calls are life-threatening, as patient needs overcome financial considerations. Surprisingly, these patterns hold across organizational forms including public, private, and non-profit organizations.

14. "Combining Individual and Firm-level Human Capital Resources: The Creation and Performance Benefits of Human Capital Alignment" (with Ryan Cooper and David Kryscynski). Revising for submission. Available on SSRN HERE and ResearchGate HERE.

We investigate how alignment between firm and individual-level human capital resources influences firm performance. We argue that a high degree of alignment between the firm and individual levels increases human capital utilization, coordination, and transfer. Drawing on Utah residential real estate data from 1996-2014, we find that brokerages with higher brokerage-agent human capital alignment engage in more transactions than brokerages with lower alignment. These benefits increase with firm size. We also find that individual-level human capital similarity in the first year significantly influences firm-individual alignment in subsequent years. These results suggest that managers from founding onward must carefully craft and manage alignment in individual and firm-level human capital resources to generate persistent performance advantages that are resistant to turnover and difficult for competitors to replicate.

15. "Specialized Human Capital in Professional Services: Task Specificity and Firm Performance." (with Ryan Cooper). Working Paper. 

This paper examines the relationship between the autonomous specialization decisions of service professionals and the tacit human capital they develop. As individuals specialize in production in response to market and organizational factors, they develop task-specific human capital which induces them to continue to specialize. Task specificity of human capital benefits the firm due to its higher productivity, even after negative shocks to the market. Individual specialization in response to market forces also leads to human capital overlap, or shared expertise among co-workers, which may have positive and negative impacts on the firm. Using a novel approach that draws on longitudinal data from the Utah real estate industry, we examine these forces empirically and find that task-specific human capital does benefit firms, even after widespread negative market shocks. Overlap also benefits firms, though it is a substitute for task specificity rather than a complement. 

WORK IN PROGRESS (but not yet full working papers)

16.  “Social Affiliations, Ethical Dilemmas, and Mortgage Defaults" (with Lamar Pierce). Data analysis stage.

In this paper we investigate whether social affiliations and relational capital between real estate agents and buyers leads agents to provide better advice and reign in potentially self-destructive buyer impulses or if it leads agents to enable buyers to achieve their dreams, regardless of the risks. 

17.   "Productivity Following EMS Encounters with Death" (with Alexandru Roman and Haibo Liu). Data analysis stage.

We explore how encounters with tragic incidents (death) influences subsequent performance of Emergency Medical Service personnel. 

18.  "Human Capital, Discrimination, and Stigma within the Federal Workforce" (with Joe Raffiee and Ryan Cooper). Data analysis stage.

In this project we investigate how exogenous natural shocks to perceptions of race influence the promotion, turnover, and hiring of minority workers. We explore these questions using a database of all federal workers in the US government from 1974-2014. 

19. “Organizational Structure, Incentives, Sorting, and Emergency Medical Service Crew Performance” (with Haibo Liu and Alexandru Roman).  Data gathering stage.

20.  Awards, long-term behavior changes, and reputation building (with Inna Smirnova). Data analysis stage.

21.  The evolution and growth of Silicon Slopes in Utah, and the role of human capital (with David Kryscynski, Jim Oldroyd, Shad Morris, and Troy Nielsen). Data gathering stage.



  • Innovative Learning Technology Initiative Grant Recipient, University of California, Riverside (with Marlo Raveendran), 2018. $107,000

  • Winner of Sumantra Ghoshal Best Paper Award, Academy of Management, 2017, Atlanta, Georgia.


  • MBA Golden Apple teaching award, University of California, Riverside. Student-voted award for best MBA teacher in MBA core courses for 2016-2017.

  • Winner of Robert J. Litschert Best Doctoral Student Paper Award, Academy of Management 2015, Vancouver, Canada.

  • Finalist: Strategic Human Capital interest group best paper award, Strategic Management Society 2015, Denver, Colorado.

  • Moog Scholar, Washington University in St. Louis, 2013-2014.